🐓

Poultry Feed Supplement

Azolla at 25–30% crude protein (dry weight) can replace 20–30% of conventional soya-based protein supplement in broiler and layer diets. Studies across Asia report comparable or improved growth rates and feed conversion ratios. Fresh azolla can be fed directly without drying.

Indicative value: ₱12–18/kg fresh weight delivered to poultry farms.

🐟

Aquaculture Feed

Azolla is well-documented as a duckweed/fern supplement for tilapia, catfish, and milkfish aquaculture in the Philippines. It can be broadcast directly into fish ponds or mixed into pellet feed. The high amino acid profile (essential amino acids present) supports fish growth comparably to commercial protein concentrates.

Indicative value: ₱8–12/kg fresh weight for direct pond broadcasting.

🌱

Organic Biofertilizer

Digester effluent from Azolla digestion is an excellent liquid biofertilizer: rich in plant-available nitrogen (from the fixed N₂), phosphorus, and micronutrients. Applied back to the leased cultivation paddies it cycles nitrogen locally; surplus volumes can be sold to surrounding rice and vegetable farms as a synthetic-fertilizer replacement.

Indicative fertilizer cost offset: ₱3,000–₱5,000/ha/yr for recipient farms (see Add-on F below for hub-scale quantification).

Revenue diversification note: The base case financial projections in this document model DM-X CBM fuel sales only. Azolla feed sales and biofertilizer income represent additional revenue streams that improve project economics beyond the base case — they are not required for loan serviceability but represent meaningful upside as the system scales into Phase 2 replication hubs and beyond.

Philippine Food Security · Protein Feed Import Dependency

The forgotten import bill.

The Philippines has a second major agricultural import dependency that receives far less public attention than fuel — but is structurally almost identical in its vulnerability. Soybean meal is the primary protein ingredient for Philippine poultry, layer, aquaculture, and pet-food industries. The country produces essentially none of it domestically, and imports are forecast to grow year on year. Any feedstock that can partially substitute for imported soybean meal addresses a real gap in national agricultural resilience.

Annual Imports · MY 2025/26
3.35MMT
Philippine soybean meal imports
USDA FAS Manila forecast. Forecast to rise +3.1% on prior year, driven by poultry, layer, aquaculture, and pet-food feed demand.
Domestic Soybean Production
<1,000MT
Produced in the Philippines annually
Effectively zero. Production has declined from 626 MT (2022) to 506 MT (2024) due to high humidity, soybean diseases, and competition from other crops. Import dependency is ~99.97%.
Annual Import Bill (est.)
~₱85billion/yr
Philippine protein-feed import cost
Approximate total PH soybean meal import bill. US alone exports $1.165B of SBM to PH per SoyStats 2025 at ~80% market share; total imports therefore ~$1.5B ≈ ₱85B at ₱57/USD.

PH Soybean Meal Import Trajectory · Marketing Year series

Source: USDA FAS Manila · USSEC
MY 2023/24
~3.0
MMT (est. total)
MY 2024/25
3.2
MMT imported
MY 2025/26 ★
3.35
MMT forecast
MY 2026/27
3.26
MMT forecast
Poultry · up Commercial broiler and layer expansion; largest consumer of SBM in feed rations.
Aquaculture · up Tilapia, milkfish, and shrimp production growth; increasing pellet-feed formulation.
Pet food · up Premiumization of PH pet food market, expanding SBM usage in formulated diets.
Swine · down African Swine Fever continues to limit hog feed demand below pre-ASF levels.
What a partial azolla substitution would mean. A single standard DM-X hub cultivating 114 ha of azolla produces ~17,100 tonnes of fresh biomass per year — equivalent to ~1,710 tonnes of dry matter or ~470 tonnes of crude protein. If any portion of cultivation is diverted from CBM to feed markets, even 10% of a 100-hub network's cultivation flowing to poultry and aquaculture feed markets would represent ~4,700 tonnes of domestic crude protein annually — structurally small against 3.35 MMT of SBM imports, but measurable in peso-retention terms and strategically meaningful as a proof of concept that the Philippines can domestically produce high-protein livestock feed on marginal water-logged land that is unsuited to conventional protein cropping.
Nutritional Profile · Azolla as Protein Feed

Not just any biomass.

For azolla to substitute for any meaningful share of imported soybean meal, it has to perform nutritionally — against the criteria feed formulators actually measure. This section documents azolla's crude protein, essential amino acid profile, digestibility by species, and practical inclusion rates, side by side with soybean meal and other common feed protein sources.

Azolla pinnata · Dry matter composition

Literature consensus
  • Crude proteinTotal N × 6.25
    25–30%
  • Crude fat (lipids)Including omega fatty acids
    3–4%
  • Crude fibreCell wall polysaccharides
    10–15%
  • Ash (mineral fraction)Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, iron
    10–15%
  • Carotenoids & chlorophyllBeta-carotene precursor, egg-yolk pigmentation
    Present
  • Vitamin B12From Anabaena symbiont — rare in plant feeds
    Present
  • Tannins / antinutritional factorsLow — does not require processing
    Low
  • Dry matter (as harvested)Before sun-drying or pelleting
    ~10%

Versus conventional protein feeds

Crude protein & amino acid profile, dry-matter basis
Feed Crude
protein
Lysine
(% of CP)
Methionine
(% of CP)
Threonine
(% of CP)
Azolla pinnata 25–30% 4.5% 1.8% 3.5%
Soybean meal (48% CP) 48% 6.3% 1.4% 3.9%
Fish meal 60–65% 7.5% 2.8% 4.2%
Corn (maize) 8–10% 2.8% 2.1% 3.7%
Napier grass 8–10% 3.5% 1.2% 3.0%
Rice straw 4–5% 2.5% 1.0% 2.8%
Azolla's 25–30% crude protein sits well above all local forages (napier, rice straw) and meaningfully above corn, though below the premium soybean meal benchmark. Crucially, its lysine content is competitive and its methionine level exceeds soybean meal — addressing the amino acid typically limiting in PH broiler rations. Not a full SBM replacement; a partial substitute at cost advantage.
Practical feed inclusion rates · published Asian field studies
Poultry
Broilers & layers
up to 10%
of total ration. Replaces 15–25% of conventional SBM component. Improved egg-yolk colour from carotenoids.
Aquaculture
Tilapia & catfish
up to 30%
Can be broadcast fresh directly into fish ponds. Best-documented application in Philippine context.
Aquaculture
Milkfish & shrimp
up to 15%
Typically incorporated as pellet feed ingredient. Lower inclusion rate reflects higher protein requirement.
Ruminant
Cattle & goats
up to 40%
Ruminant digestive system handles higher inclusion rates; azolla often fed fresh or ensiled with other forages.
How to read this section. Azolla is not a one-for-one substitute for premium imported soybean meal in any ration — its crude protein is about 60% of SBM, and its amino acid profile has strengths and weaknesses compared to the benchmark. What it offers is a domestically-produced, nitrogen-fixing, low-antinutritional partial substitute that works best in species where inclusion rates can reach double digits without performance loss: poultry at up to 10%, tilapia at up to 30%, ruminants at up to 40%. For DM-XTech, this means the secondary-market opportunity is real but bounded — azolla will never displace SBM entirely, but can meaningfully displace 10–20% of the SBM component in rations where it is used.
Biofertilizer Value · Digestate as Nitrogen Return

Biology in, biology out.

Anaerobic digestion does not destroy nitrogen — it conserves and mineralises it. The nitrogen that Anabaena azollae fixed from atmosphere during cultivation remains in the digester effluent, now in its most plant-available form (ammonium). For a standard 50 Nm³/h CBM hub, this represents a meaningful secondary nitrogen stream that can be cycled back to cultivation paddies or sold to adjacent rice and vegetable farms.

Per Standard Hub · Digestate N Budget
01
Fresh azolla input
economics.html · 50 Nm³/h × 82% util × 47.6 kg/Nm³
17,100t/yr
02
Nitrogen input to digester
17,100 t × 10% DM × 3% N in DM (azolla)
~51t N/yr
03
N retained in digestate
~85% recovery · balance lost to gas-phase NH₃
~43t N/yr
04
Urea equivalent
43 t N ÷ 46% N content of urea
~94t urea/yr
05
PH urea retail price
indicative · Apr 2026
₱18/kg
Σ
Maximum digestate fertiliser value per hub per year
if fully monetised at urea parity
~₱1.7M/yr
Allocation A · Default
Recycled to own cultivation paddies
₱0incremental
Already embedded in the ₱0.40/kg cultivation cost. Closes the nutrient loop: fixed N → azolla growth → biodigester → digestate → back to paddies. No new revenue line, but zero external fertiliser input required.
Allocation B · Upside
Sold to adjacent rice & vegetable farms
up to ~₱1.7M/yr
At urea-parity pricing for the displaced synthetic fertiliser. Realistic realisation is a fraction of this (liquid digestate typically discounted 40–60% vs dry urea for transport and application cost).
Market context
PH rice has 4.7M ha
~₱40B/yr
Philippine rice farming N-fertiliser expenditure. Even a standard hub placing digestate within a 20 km radius addresses only a tiny slice — but the fertiliser need is vast and consistent.
The closed nitrogen loop — per hub
How fixed nitrogen flows through a DM-X hub and back
Atmospheric N₂ Air · zero cost Anabaena fixation ~600 kg N/ha/yr in leaf cavities Azolla biomass 17,100 t fresh · ~51 t N Biodigester CBM + digestate Digestate ~43 t N/yr retained Allocation A: paddies · B: sold Cultivation paddies 114 ha leased fixed harvest input effluent split recycled N new growth
On the cleanness of the biofertilizer allocation. The ₱1.7M/yr per-hub figure represents the upper-bound urea-parity value of digestate nitrogen. In the base case financial model in economics.html, digestate is assumed to be fully recycled to own cultivation paddies — which is why no biofertilizer revenue line appears in the 5-year P&L. Actual deployment will likely split between recycling (primary, free, embedded in cultivation cost) and external sales (secondary, where adjacent rice farms are willing to pay). Even at 30% external-sale realisation at 50% discount to urea parity, that is ~₱250,000/yr per hub of additional revenue — small at Phase 1 scale, material at 25-hub Phase 2 (~₱6.3M/yr), and a meaningful rural fertiliser-cost reduction story at national scale.